Aphasia
Research on supporting communication for people with aphasia, including functional language practice in everyday speaking situations.
Virtual reality has been explored as a tool for supporting communication in aphasia, where VR environments offer functional practice that goes beyond traditional desk-based activities.
Research has demonstrated that people with aphasia can interact meaningfully in virtual environments, practicing everyday communication tasks like ordering in a cafe, navigating social conversations, and participating in group activities. These environments provide the kind of functional, contextualized practice that research consistently identifies as important for communication participation.
The key advantage of VR for aphasia is ecological validity: practicing communication in contexts that resemble real life, rather than in isolated clinical activities. Skills built in realistic contexts are more likely to be useful in everyday situations.
Recent work has begun to compare immersive VR with desktop or static digital approaches directly, with within-subjects designs offering some of the most rigorous evidence yet that immersive practice produces measurable advantages for word finding and conversation.
7 Studies
Immersive VR helps healthy adults learn rare words faster than a tablet method, but does not outperform a structured tablet method for aphasia anomia rehabilitation
Two within-subject experiments using a virtual marketplace iVR application against a matched-exposure tablet (digital static learning, DSL) method. In 32 neurotypical French adults learning rare French words, iVR significantly outperformed DSL by Day 3 (z = 4.556, p < .0001). In 16 people with mild-to-moderate post-stroke aphasia learning frequent French words in a crossover design, both methods produced significant learning gains across Day 1, 5, 12, and 19 (p < .001), but iVR was NOT significantly better than DSL on accuracy (estimate 0.025, p = .704).
Pilot RCT in 32 children with developmental language disorder (mean age 4.8y): broader language gains with VR-supported therapy and 100% retention over six months
32 children (mean age 4.8 years) with developmental language disorder were randomized to VR-supported speech intervention or standard care for six months (2 × 1-hour sessions per week). The VR system used was VRRS - a non-immersive 2D touch-screen platform, not a head-mounted display. The VR group showed within-group improvements across more language domains than the control group. Retention was 100% - no dropouts - a feasibility signal that matters in this age group.
First systematic review of VR in aphasia rehabilitation: a comprehensive synthesis of the evidence base from City University of London / Center for Excellence in Aphasia Research
The first systematic review synthesizing the evidence base for using virtual reality in the rehabilitation of aphasia. Conducted by the Devane / Marshall / Hilari City University of London group. Published in Disability and Rehabilitation, the established Taylor & Francis peer-reviewed rehabilitation journal. The review covers types of VR systems used, target rehabilitation goals (anomia, conversation, social participation, attention), outcome measures, and effectiveness across the included studies. With 26+ citations and over 11,000 article views by 2025, this is the foundational synthesis reference for VR-in-aphasia rehabilitation work.
A feasibility RCT of group social support in a virtual world for aphasia - feasibility met, no significant quantitative outcomes
A waitlist randomized feasibility RCT with 34 recruited (29 completed, 85.3%). People with aphasia attended 14 EVA Park social group sessions over 6 months. Feasibility targets were met: recruitment achieved, 85.3% completion, all groups ran as planned. However, no significant change was observed on any quantitative outcome measure (wellbeing, communication, social connectedness, quality of life). Qualitative reports were positive. Trial registered NCT03115268.
VR conversational practice helps people with aphasia communicate more effectively
A pilot RCT with 36 people with chronic aphasia comparing semi-immersive VR conversational practice (NeuroVR 2.0 on a 50-inch curved screen - not a headset) to conventional therapy over 6 months. No significant between-group differences were found on any measure. Within-group analysis showed the VR group improved on more domains, and only the VR group improved on self-esteem and emotional/mood state.
An interactive gaming system helps people with aphasia improve word-finding and verbal fluency
An RCT found that people with aphasia who used an interactive gaming system showed improvements in naming ability and verbal fluency compared to those receiving conventional support, suggesting game-based approaches can complement language recovery.
A virtual world gives people with aphasia more opportunities to practice communication
People with aphasia who spent time communicating in a virtual world called EVA Park showed meaningful improvements in functional communication and reported greater confidence in their everyday interactions.
See the Software for Yourself
Whether you have questions, want to see the software, or are ready to get started - help is always available.
Get in TouchNo obligation - see the software before you commit