First long-term (4-6 year) follow-up of VR exposure therapy and exposure group therapy for social anxiety disorder: durable gains, with 54% no longer meeting diagnostic criteria
How this was rated
Long-term follow-up (mean 6 years) of a previously published RCT (Anderson et al. 2013) is rare and clinically valuable. Twenty-eight of the original RCT participants were assessed. Peer-reviewed in Cognitive Therapy and Research (Springer, established peer-reviewed psychology journal). Limitations: attrition over the long follow-up window means the sample assessed is a subset of the original RCT; participants who were doing worse may have been less likely to engage with follow-up assessment (a positive-skew bias). The within-subjects pre-to-follow-up improvement is robust, but the comparison between VRET and exposure group therapy at follow-up is underpowered to detect small differences. Diagnostic interviews and behavioral speech tasks add objectivity beyond self-report alone.
Ratings use a simplified four-tier scheme (High, Moderate, Low, Very Low) informed by the GRADE working group. Learn more about how studies are rated.
Twenty-eight participants from the Anderson et al. 2013 RCT of VR exposure therapy (VRET) vs exposure group therapy for DSM-diagnosed social anxiety disorder were re-assessed a mean of 6 years (range 4-6) after treatment completion. Self-report measures, behavioral speech tasks, and diagnostic interviews all showed statistically significant improvement from pre-treatment to long-term follow-up. The majority (54%) no longer met diagnostic criteria for SAD; 68% rated themselves 'very much' or 'much' improved. With one exception, there were no differences between VRET and exposure group therapy at follow-up - both produce durable long-term benefits, consistent with the broader CBT-for-SAD evidence base.
The first published long-term (4-6 year) follow-up of VRET for social anxiety disorder. Gains from the 8-session treatment (originally reported in Anderson et al. 2013) were maintained, with the majority of participants no longer meeting SAD diagnostic criteria and the vast majority rating themselves substantially improved. VRET and exposure group therapy were equivalently effective at long-term follow-up. For clinicians considering VRET as an alternative or adjunct to group therapy for SAD/PSA, this study provides the strongest available long-term durability evidence. Important caveat: this is a follow-up of treatment completers, not all originally randomised participants - attrition over 4-6 years limits generalization.
Key findings
- First long-term (mean 6 years, range 4-6 years post-treatment) follow-up of VRET for SAD - a rare and clinically valuable design
- 28 participants from the original Anderson et al. 2013 RCT (which compared VRET vs exposure group therapy across 8 sessions for DSM-diagnosed SAD with public speaking fears) were re-assessed
- Statistically significant improvement from pre-treatment to long-term follow-up on ALL self-report measures of public speaking anxiety and fear of negative evaluation
- Diagnostic interviews showed 54% no longer met DSM diagnostic criteria for SAD - a clinically meaningful proportion given the durable, distressing nature of untreated SAD
- Self-rated global improvement: 68% rated themselves 'very much' or 'much' improved
- Behavioral speech task: all participants completed it (with two exceptions: one declined, one completed by phone) - persistence of the treatment-target behavioral skill
- VRET vs exposure group therapy: with one exception, no significant differences at follow-up across self-report, clinician-rated, and behavioral data
- Sample at follow-up: ethnically diverse, middle-aged (mean age 42), 71% female
Background
Anderson and colleagues published a landmark RCT in 2013 (in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology) comparing 8-session virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) to 8-session exposure group therapy for adults with DSM-diagnosed social anxiety disorder (SAD) including public speaking fears. The 2013 paper established VRET as a credible alternative to group exposure therapy for SAD on short-term outcomes. However, the long-term durability of VRET-driven gains had not been tested - this is the standard question for any evidence-based psychotherapy.
Twenty years earlier, Cognitive Therapy and Research published Heimberg et al.’s 5-year follow-up of cognitive-behavioral group therapy for SAD, which remains a benchmark for long-term SAD treatment outcomes. The present study extends this paradigm to VRET.
What the researchers did
Twenty-eight participants from the Anderson et al. 2013 RCT were re-assessed a mean of 6 years (range 4-6) after treatment completion. The original RCT had allocated participants to either VRET or exposure group therapy, both delivered across 8 sessions according to a treatment manual. The follow-up assessment included:
- standardised self-report measures of public speaking anxiety and fear of negative evaluation
- a behavioral speech task
- a diagnostic interview
- global self-ratings of improvement
The sample at follow-up was ethnically diverse, middle-aged (mean age 42), and 71% female.
What they found
- Statistically significant improvement on ALL self-report measures from pre-treatment to long-term follow-up.
- 54% no longer met DSM diagnostic criteria for SAD at follow-up - a clinically meaningful diagnostic-status change.
- 68% rated themselves “very much” or “much” improved on global improvement ratings.
- Behavioral speech task was completed by all participants except two (one declined, one completed by phone) - the treatment-target behavioral skill (speaking in front of others) persisted.
- VRET vs exposure group therapy: with one exception, no significant differences at follow-up across self-report, clinician-rated, and behavioral data. Both treatments produce durable long-term benefits.
Why this matters
For clinicians considering VRET as an alternative or adjunct to group therapy for SAD or PSA, this study answers the key durability question: 8-session gains are largely maintained at 4-6 years. The 54% diagnostic-remission figure is comparable to long-term outcomes reported for traditional CBT-for-SAD. VRET produces durable change, not just short-term anxiety-management effects.
For PWS with social anxiety comorbidity (a common clinical pattern), this long-term durability matters because stuttering-associated social anxiety is itself durable. However, the original RCT and this follow-up are in SAD-with-PSA samples, not specifically PWS - direct generalization to stuttering populations requires PWS-specific long-term data.
Limitations
- Attrition over 6 years. Twenty-eight of the original Anderson 2013 RCT participants were re-assessed; participants doing worse may have been less likely to engage with follow-up (positive-skew bias).
- No formal between-group power analysis for the follow-up comparison - VRET vs exposure group therapy may differ in ways this study lacked power to detect.
- Self-report dominates outcome measurement - although the diagnostic interview and behavioral speech task add objective anchors.
- SAD-with-PSA sample - generalization to other communication-disorder populations with social-anxiety comorbidity (e.g., PWS, voice disorders, gender-affirming voice work) requires direct study.
- Original RCT VRET system was research-grade era-appropriate hardware - the absolute durability of contemporary consumer-hardware VRET (Meta Quest 2/3, Lindner 2019 paradigm) at 4-6 years has not been tested.
Implications for practice
For clinicians considering VRET as an alternative or adjunct to group therapy for SAD or public speaking anxiety, this study answers the key durability question: gains made during 8 sessions of either VRET or exposure group therapy are largely maintained 4-6 years later. The 54% who no longer meet SAD criteria at long-term follow-up is a clinically meaningful figure, comparable to long-term outcomes reported for traditional CBT-for-SAD. VRET is not merely a short-term anxiety-management trick - it can produce durable change. For PWS with social anxiety comorbidity, this long-term durability is particularly relevant given that stuttering-associated social anxiety is itself durable and benefits from interventions with carryover. Caveat: this follow-up is in a SAD-with-PSA sample, not specifically PWS - direct generalization to stuttering populations requires PWS-specific long-term data.
Cite this study
If you reference this study in your work, the canonical citation formats are:
@article{anderson2017,
author = {Anderson, P. L. and Edwards, S. M. and Goodnight, J. R.},
title = {Virtual Reality and Exposure Group Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: Results from a 4–6 Year Follow-Up},
journal = {Cognitive Therapy and Research},
year = {2017},
doi = {10.1007/s10608-016-9820-y},
url = {https://withvr.app/evidence/studies/anderson-2017}
}TY - JOUR
AU - Anderson, P. L.
AU - Edwards, S. M.
AU - Goodnight, J. R.
TI - Virtual Reality and Exposure Group Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: Results from a 4–6 Year Follow-Up
JO - Cognitive Therapy and Research
PY - 2017
DO - 10.1007/s10608-016-9820-y
UR - https://withvr.app/evidence/studies/anderson-2017
ER - Know of research that should be in this hub? If a relevant peer-reviewed study is not listed here, send the reference to hello@withvr.app. The hub is kept up to date as the literature grows.
Funding & independence
Affiliations: lead author at Georgia State University (per Anderson 2013 RCT origin). Funding sources for the follow-up not extracted in detail; the original RCT was NIH-funded. Peer-reviewed in Cognitive Therapy and Research (Springer). No withVR BV involvement in funding, study design, or authorship. Summary prepared independently by withVR using the published peer-reviewed paper. The VR system used in the original RCT and described in this follow-up is NOT Therapy withVR or Research withVR; it was the era-appropriate research VRET system used by the Anderson group.